Terrine Caille vs Terrine de caille à l'armagnac
Overall, Terrine de caille à l'armagnac has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Terrine Caille | Terrine de caille à l'armagn... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 339 kcal | 200 kcal |
| Fat | 30.1 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 10 g | 5.8 g |
| Sugars | 1.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 1.7 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Terrine de caille à l'armagnac has 41% fewer calories (200 kcal vs 339 kcal).
- Terrine de caille à l'armagnac has 50% less fat (15 g vs 30.1 g).
- Terrine de caille à l'armagnac has 42% less saturated fat (5.8 g vs 10 g).
- Terrine de caille à l'armagnac has 85% less sugar (0.2 g vs 1.3 g).
- Terrine de caille à l'armagnac has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Terrine Caille
Not available.
Terrine de caille à l'armagnac
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Terrine Caille or Terrine de caille à l'armagnac?
Overall, Terrine de caille à l'armagnac has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Terrine de caille à l'armagnac has fewer calories: 200 kcal versus 339 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Terrine de caille à l'armagnac has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.