Tendrissime vs St hubert omega 3 255 g doux
Overall, St hubert omega 3 255 g doux has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tendrissime | St hubert omega 3 255 g doux |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 2 | 4 |
| Calories | 640 kcal | 468 kcal |
| Fat | 70 g | 52 g |
| Saturated fat | 49 g | 16 g |
| Sugars | 1.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 0.4 g | — |
| Protein | 1 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 4 |
| Allergens | Milk | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- St hubert omega 3 255 g doux has 27% fewer calories (468 kcal vs 640 kcal).
- St hubert omega 3 255 g doux has 26% less fat (52 g vs 70 g).
- St hubert omega 3 255 g doux has 67% less saturated fat (16 g vs 49 g).
- St hubert omega 3 255 g doux has no sugar, while Tendrissime has 1.5 g.
- Tendrissime has 93% less salt (0 g vs 0.4 g).
- Tendrissime has 100% more protein (1 g vs 0 g).
- St hubert omega 3 255 g doux has the better Nutri-Score.
- Tendrissime is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Tendrissime lists: Milk.
- Only St hubert omega 3 255 g doux lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Tendrissime
Beurre (lait), crème légère (lait) (Crème Origine UE)
St hubert omega 3 255 g doux
Huiles et stéarines végétales 52% (colza 30,1%, palmiste, lin5,4%, palme), eau, émulsifiant (lécithine de SOJA), sel, arômes, colorant : bêta-carotène, vitamine B1
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tendrissime or St hubert omega 3 255 g doux?
Overall, St hubert omega 3 255 g doux has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
St hubert omega 3 255 g doux has fewer calories: 468 kcal versus 640 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
St hubert omega 3 255 g doux has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.