Tenders de Dinde vs Ostepanetter Kylling/Kalkun 480g Prior
Overall, Tenders de Dinde has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Tenders de Dinde
Ostepanetter Kylling/Kalkun 480g Prior
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tenders de Dinde | Ostepanetter Kylling/Kalkun... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 216 kcal | 197 kcal |
| Fat | 11.5 g | 7.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.8 g | 2.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 15.9 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 8 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ostepanetter Kylling/Kalkun 480g Prior has 31% less fat (7.9 g vs 11.5 g).
- Tenders de Dinde has 14% less saturated fat (1.8 g vs 2.1 g).
- Tenders de Dinde has 83% less sugar (0.2 g vs 1.2 g).
- Tenders de Dinde has 41% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.5 g).
- Tenders de Dinde has 18% more protein (15.9 g vs 13 g).
- Tenders de Dinde has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Tenders de Dinde
Not available.
Ostepanetter Kylling/Kalkun 480g Prior
Kjøtt fra kalkun og kylling (51 %), ost (melk) (7 %), vann, mais, salt, potetflakes, krydder, hvitløk, aroma, dekstrose, potetmel, kikertmel, hevemiddel e450, e500, stabilisator e414, antioksidant e300, e339, e307, e331, konserveringsmiddel e221. stekt i raps og solsikkeolje.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tenders de Dinde or Ostepanetter Kylling/Kalkun 480g Prior?
Overall, Tenders de Dinde has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ostepanetter Kylling/Kalkun 480g Prior has fewer calories: 197 kcal versus 216 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tenders de Dinde has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.