Tarhoňa vs Estroganon senf
Overall, Tarhoňa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tarhoňa | Estroganon senf |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 358 kcal | 123 kcal |
| Fat | 1.2 g | 6.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | — |
| Sugars | 2.6 g | 5.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 2.3 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 5.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Estroganon senf has 66% fewer calories (123 kcal vs 358 kcal).
- Tarhoňa has 82% less fat (1.2 g vs 6.6 g).
- Tarhoňa has 54% less sugar (2.6 g vs 5.7 g).
- Tarhoňa has 99% less salt (0 g vs 2.3 g).
- Tarhoňa has 46% more protein (11 g vs 5.9 g).
- Tarhoňa is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Tarhoňa lists: Gluten.
- Only Estroganon senf lists: Mustard.
Ingredients
Tarhoňa
PŠENIČNÁ mouka.
Estroganon senf
Wasser, Senfsaat, Weingeistessig (D: Branntweinessig), Zucker, Salz, Gewürze, natürliches Aroma. Ohne Zusatz von Konservierungsstoffen. Vor Gebrauch schütteln.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tarhoňa or Estroganon senf?
Overall, Tarhoňa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Estroganon senf has fewer calories: 123 kcal versus 358 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tarhoňa has less sugar: 2.6 g versus 5.7 g per 100 g.