Comparison
Tarama au crabe vs Tarama au crabe
Overall, Tarama au crabe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tarama au crabe | Tarama au crabe |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 428 kcal | 518 kcal |
| Fat | 41.2 g | 53.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.7 g | 7.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 2.5 g | 1.9 g |
| Protein | 10.8 g | 7.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tarama au crabe has 17% fewer calories (428 kcal vs 518 kcal).
- Tarama au crabe has 23% less fat (41.2 g vs 53.8 g).
- Tarama au crabe has 49% less saturated fat (3.7 g vs 7.3 g).
- Tarama au crabe has 25% less salt (1.9 g vs 2.5 g).
- Tarama au crabe has 28% more protein (10.8 g vs 7.8 g).
Ingredients
Tarama au crabe
Not available.
Tarama au crabe
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tarama au crabe or Tarama au crabe?
Overall, Tarama au crabe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tarama au crabe has fewer calories: 428 kcal versus 518 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tarama au crabe has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.