Comparison
Tarama au crabe vs Tarama au crabe
Overall, Tarama au crabe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tarama au crabe | Tarama au crabe |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 428 kcal | 545 kcal |
| Fat | 41.2 g | 54 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.7 g | 31 g |
| Sugars | 0.4 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 2.5 g | 1.2 g |
| Protein | 10.8 g | 5.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tarama au crabe has 21% fewer calories (428 kcal vs 545 kcal).
- Tarama au crabe has 24% less fat (41.2 g vs 54 g).
- Tarama au crabe has 88% less saturated fat (3.7 g vs 31 g).
- Tarama au crabe has 54% less salt (1.2 g vs 2.5 g).
- Tarama au crabe has 50% more protein (10.8 g vs 5.4 g).
Ingredients
Tarama au crabe
Not available.
Tarama au crabe
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tarama au crabe or Tarama au crabe?
Overall, Tarama au crabe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tarama au crabe has fewer calories: 428 kcal versus 545 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tarama au crabe has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 0.4 g per 100 g.