Comparison

Tafelmeerretich würzig-pikant vs Kren-Steirer Kren

Overall, Kren-Steirer Kren has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTafelmeerretich würzig-pikan...Kren-Steirer Kren
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 161 kcal 124 kcal
Fat 12 g 4.7 g
Saturated fat 0.9 g 0.3 g
Sugars 6.7 g 8 g
Salt 0.3 g 0.6 g
Fiber 3.2 g 6.8 g
Protein 1.6 g 4.4 g
Additives32
AllergensMilk, MustardNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kren-Steirer Kren has 23% fewer calories (124 kcal vs 161 kcal).
  • Kren-Steirer Kren has 61% less fat (4.7 g vs 12 g).
  • Kren-Steirer Kren has 67% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Tafelmeerretich würzig-pikant has 16% less sugar (6.7 g vs 8 g).
  • Kren-Steirer Kren has 53% more fiber (6.8 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Kren-Steirer Kren has 64% more protein (4.4 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Kren-Steirer Kren has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Kren-Steirer Kren is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Tafelmeerretich würzig-pikant lists: Milk, Mustard.

Ingredients

Tafelmeerretich würzig-pikant

Meerrettich, Wasser, Branntweinessig, Rapsöl, Zucker, Salz, Stärke, Molkenerzeugnis, Stabilisator: Xanthan; Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure; Antioxidationsmittel: Natriummetabisulfit.

Kren-Steirer Kren

Steirischer Kren g.g.A. (95 %), Rapsöl, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure; Salz, Antioxidationsmittel: Natriummetabisulfit.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tafelmeerretich würzig-pikant or Kren-Steirer Kren?

Overall, Kren-Steirer Kren has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kren-Steirer Kren has fewer calories: 124 kcal versus 161 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tafelmeerretich würzig-pikant has less sugar: 6.7 g versus 8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons