Comparison

Cren rafano dalla Baviera gusto piccante vs Kren-Steirer Kren

Overall, Kren-Steirer Kren has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCren rafano dalla Baviera gu...Kren-Steirer Kren
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 167 kcal 124 kcal
Fat 12 g 4.7 g
Saturated fat 1 g 0.3 g
Sugars 6.9 g 8 g
Salt 0.3 g 0.6 g
Fiber — 6.8 g
Protein 1.7 g 4.4 g
Additives12
AllergensMilk, MustardNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kren-Steirer Kren has 26% fewer calories (124 kcal vs 167 kcal).
  • Kren-Steirer Kren has 61% less fat (4.7 g vs 12 g).
  • Kren-Steirer Kren has 70% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 1 g).
  • Cren rafano dalla Baviera gusto piccante has 14% less sugar (6.9 g vs 8 g).
  • Kren-Steirer Kren has 61% more protein (4.4 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Kren-Steirer Kren has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Kren-Steirer Kren is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Cren rafano dalla Baviera gusto piccante lists: Milk, Mustard.

Ingredients

Cren rafano dalla Baviera gusto piccante

Rafano (60%), aceto di acquavite, olio di colza, zucchero, sale, acido citrico, derivati del siero di latte, gomma di xantan, amido, metabisolifo di sodio, aromi naturali

Kren-Steirer Kren

Steirischer Kren g.g.A. (95 %), Rapsöl, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure; Salz, Antioxidationsmittel: Natriummetabisulfit.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cren rafano dalla Baviera gusto piccante or Kren-Steirer Kren?

Overall, Kren-Steirer Kren has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kren-Steirer Kren has fewer calories: 124 kcal versus 167 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Cren rafano dalla Baviera gusto piccante has less sugar: 6.9 g versus 8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons