Sweet & Fiery Beetroot vs Betteraves Rouges Cuites et Épluchées
Overall, Betteraves Rouges Cuites et Épluchées has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Sweet & Fiery Beetroot
Betteraves Rouges Cuites et Épluchées
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sweet & Fiery Beetroot | Betteraves Rouges Cuites et... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 93 kcal | 43 kcal |
| Fat | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 19.7 g | 6.7 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 2.1 g | 2.5 g |
| Protein | 1.3 g | 1.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Betteraves Rouges Cuites et Épluchées has 54% fewer calories (43 kcal vs 93 kcal).
- Betteraves Rouges Cuites et Épluchées has 66% less sugar (6.7 g vs 19.7 g).
- Betteraves Rouges Cuites et Épluchées has 62% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.6 g).
- Betteraves Rouges Cuites et Épluchées has 16% more fiber (2.5 g vs 2.1 g).
- Betteraves Rouges Cuites et Épluchées has the better Nutri-Score.
- Betteraves Rouges Cuites et Épluchées is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Sweet & Fiery Beetroot
Beetroot (98%), White Wine Vinegar, Sugar, Salt, Chilli Extract [Chilli Extract, Olive Oil].
Betteraves Rouges Cuites et Épluchées
Betteraves rouges cuites
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sweet & Fiery Beetroot or Betteraves Rouges Cuites et Épluchées?
Overall, Betteraves Rouges Cuites et Épluchées has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Betteraves Rouges Cuites et Épluchées has fewer calories: 43 kcal versus 93 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Betteraves Rouges Cuites et Épluchées has less sugar: 6.7 g versus 19.7 g per 100 g.