Swanson broth chicken vs Caldo de pollo natural
Overall, Caldo de pollo natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Swanson broth chicken | Caldo de pollo natural |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 4 kcal | 7 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.4 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 1.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Celery |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Caldo de pollo natural has no sugar, while Swanson broth chicken has 0.4 g.
- Caldo de pollo natural has 65% more protein (1.2 g vs 0.4 g).
- Swanson broth chicken has the better Nutri-Score.
- Caldo de pollo natural is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Caldo de pollo natural lists: Celery.
Ingredients
Swanson broth chicken
Chicken stock**, chicken flavor**, sea salt, carrot juice**, onion juice**, garlic**, spice**, tomato paste**, turmeric**. **organic
Caldo de pollo natural
Agua, pollo fresco 33%, cebolla, puerro, _apio_, zanahoria, sal
FAQ
Which is healthier: Swanson broth chicken or Caldo de pollo natural?
Overall, Caldo de pollo natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Swanson broth chicken has fewer calories: 4 kcal versus 7 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Caldo de pollo natural has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.4 g per 100 g.