Super Mass Gainer vs Wild Protein Chocolate Bitter
Overall, Super Mass Gainer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Super Mass Gainer | Wild Protein Chocolate Bitte... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 338 kcal | 386 kcal |
| Fat | 7 g | 11.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 4 g | 4.1 g |
| Sugars | 26 g | 12.3 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 31 g | 31.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | Peanuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Super Mass Gainer has 12% fewer calories (338 kcal vs 386 kcal).
- Super Mass Gainer has 41% less fat (7 g vs 11.9 g).
- Wild Protein Chocolate Bitter has 53% less sugar (12.3 g vs 26 g).
- Super Mass Gainer has 73% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.9 g).
- Only Wild Protein Chocolate Bitter lists: Peanuts.
Ingredients
Super Mass Gainer
Not available.
Wild Protein Chocolate Bitter
Pasta de dátil (20%), maltitol, proteína aislada de soya, chocolate (16%) (pasta de cacao, maltitol, lecitina de colza, poliricinoleato de poliglicerol, saborizante natural), proteína aislada de arveja, pasta de maní, cacao en polvo, almidón de tapioca.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Super Mass Gainer or Wild Protein Chocolate Bitter?
Overall, Super Mass Gainer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Super Mass Gainer has fewer calories: 338 kcal versus 386 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Wild Protein Chocolate Bitter has less sugar: 12.3 g versus 26 g per 100 g.