Comparison

Super Mass Gainer vs Protein Chocolate - Coco

Overall, Super Mass Gainer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSuper Mass GainerProtein Chocolate - Coco
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group — 4
Calories 338 kcal 396 kcal
Fat 7 g 14 g
Saturated fat 4 g 6.8 g
Sugars 26 g 16.9 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.9 g
Fiber — 3 g
Protein 31 g 31.2 g
Additives03
AllergensNone listedPeanuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Super Mass Gainer has 15% fewer calories (338 kcal vs 396 kcal).
  • Super Mass Gainer has 50% less fat (7 g vs 14 g).
  • Super Mass Gainer has 41% less saturated fat (4 g vs 6.8 g).
  • Protein Chocolate - Coco has 35% less sugar (16.9 g vs 26 g).
  • Super Mass Gainer has 74% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Super Mass Gainer has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Protein Chocolate - Coco lists: Peanuts.

Ingredients

Super Mass Gainer

Not available.

Protein Chocolate - Coco

Pasta de dátil (20%), proteína aislada de soya, maltitol, proteína aislada de arveja, chocolate (9%) (pasta de cacao, maltitol, lecitina de colza, poliricinoleato de poliglicerol, saborizante natural), pasta de maní, coco rallado (7%), cacao en polvo, almidón de tapioca, saborizante idéntico a natural.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Super Mass Gainer or Protein Chocolate - Coco?

Overall, Super Mass Gainer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Super Mass Gainer has fewer calories: 338 kcal versus 396 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Protein Chocolate - Coco has less sugar: 16.9 g versus 26 g per 100 g.

More comparisons