Šunka vs Šunka Zvonařka
Overall, Šunka has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Šunka | Šunka Zvonařka |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 109 kcal | 155 kcal |
| Fat | 5 g | 8 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.5 g | 2.3 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 2 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 19.1 g |
| Additives | 6 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Šunka has 30% fewer calories (109 kcal vs 155 kcal).
- Šunka has 38% less fat (5 g vs 8 g).
- Šunka has 35% less saturated fat (1.5 g vs 2.3 g).
- Šunka has 24% less salt (1.5 g vs 2 g).
- Šunka Zvonařka has 21% more protein (19.1 g vs 15 g).
- Šunka has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Šunka
70% meso svinjskog buta, voda, kuhinjska sol, kalijev klorid, stabilizatori: difosfati, polifosfati; regulator kiselosti: trifosfati; zgušnjivač: prerađena morska alga euchema; škrob, šećer, dekstroza, arome, aroma dima, antioksidans: natrijev askorbat; konzervans: natrijev nitrit.
Šunka Zvonařka
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Šunka or Šunka Zvonařka?
Overall, Šunka has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Šunka has fewer calories: 109 kcal versus 155 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Šunka Zvonařka has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 1 g per 100 g.