Sunflower Seeds Hulled & Roasted Chilli vs Pipas gigantes aguasal
Overall, Pipas gigantes aguasal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Sunflower Seeds Hulled & Roasted Chilli
Pipas gigantes aguasal
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sunflower Seeds Hulled & Roa... | Pipas gigantes aguasal |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 597 kcal | 618 kcal |
| Fat | 52.8 g | 52 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.2 g | 6.6 g |
| Sugars | 3.5 g | 3.5 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 8.1 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 20.9 g | 31 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pipas gigantes aguasal has 73% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.9 g).
- Sunflower Seeds Hulled & Roasted Chilli has 100% more fiber (8.1 g vs 0 g).
- Pipas gigantes aguasal has 33% more protein (31 g vs 20.9 g).
- Pipas gigantes aguasal has the better Nutri-Score.
- Pipas gigantes aguasal is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Sunflower Seeds Hulled & Roasted Chilli
88% loupaná slunečnicová semínka, palmový olej, ochucující s jedlá sůl, koření (paprika, chilli*, cibule), rýžová mouka, dextróza, arc barvivo: paprikový extrakt; chilli ext *0,3% v konečném produktu. Může obsahovat stopy arašídů, skořápko plodů a obilovin obsahujících lepel.
Pipas gigantes aguasal
pipas de girasol y sal (6%),
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sunflower Seeds Hulled & Roasted Chilli or Pipas gigantes aguasal?
Overall, Pipas gigantes aguasal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sunflower Seeds Hulled & Roasted Chilli has fewer calories: 597 kcal versus 618 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sunflower Seeds Hulled & Roasted Chilli has less sugar: 3.5 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.