Sugo alla Siciliana vs Sauce tomate aux olives
Overall, Sugo alla Siciliana has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sugo alla Siciliana | Sauce tomate aux olives |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 59 kcal | 77 kcal |
| Fat | 3.1 g | 4.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 4.2 g | 4.8 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 2.6 g | 2.1 g |
| Protein | 1.3 g | 1.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Celery | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sugo alla Siciliana has 23% fewer calories (59 kcal vs 77 kcal).
- Sugo alla Siciliana has 31% less fat (3.1 g vs 4.5 g).
- Sugo alla Siciliana has 12% less sugar (4.2 g vs 4.8 g).
- Sugo alla Siciliana has 19% more fiber (2.6 g vs 2.1 g).
- Sauce tomate aux olives has 32% more protein (1.9 g vs 1.3 g).
- Sugo alla Siciliana has the better Nutri-Score.
- Sugo alla Siciliana is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Sugo alla Siciliana lists: Celery.
Ingredients
Sugo alla Siciliana
Polpa di pomodoro 79%, olive verdi e nere 11%, olio extravergine di oliva 2%, carote, amido di riso, cipolla, sedano, sale, zucchero, aglio, origano.
Sauce tomate aux olives
Pulpe de tomates 63%, concentré de tomates 12%, olives 10% (olives vertes 5%, olives noires 5%), eau, oignons, huile de tournesol, câpres, sucre, arômes naturels, sel, persil, ail, origan.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sugo alla Siciliana or Sauce tomate aux olives?
Overall, Sugo alla Siciliana has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sugo alla Siciliana has fewer calories: 59 kcal versus 77 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sugo alla Siciliana has less sugar: 4.2 g versus 4.8 g per 100 g.