Comparison
Sucrine Salade croquante vs Sucrine
Overall, Sucrine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sucrine Salade croquante | Sucrine |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 11 kcal | 14 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 1.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sucrine Salade croquante has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Sucrine has 57% less sugar (0.6 g vs 1.4 g).
- Sucrine has 28% more fiber (1.8 g vs 1.3 g).
Ingredients
Sucrine Salade croquante
Sucrine
Sucrine
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sucrine Salade croquante or Sucrine?
Overall, Sucrine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sucrine Salade croquante has fewer calories: 11 kcal versus 14 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sucrine has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.