Comparison
Salade Sucrine vs Sucrine
Overall, Salade Sucrine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Salade Sucrine | Sucrine |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 7 kcal | 14 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.4 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 0.9 g | 1.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Salade Sucrine has 52% fewer calories (7 kcal vs 14 kcal).
- Salade Sucrine has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
Ingredients
Salade Sucrine
Not available.
Sucrine
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Salade Sucrine or Sucrine?
Overall, Salade Sucrine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Salade Sucrine has fewer calories: 7 kcal versus 14 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Salade Sucrine has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.