Comparison
Sucrine verte vs Sucrine
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sucrine verte | Sucrine |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 20 kcal | 14 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 1.5 g | 1.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sucrine has 28% fewer calories (14 kcal vs 20 kcal).
- Sucrine verte has 60% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Sucrine has 70% less sugar (0.6 g vs 2 g).
- Sucrine verte has 25% more protein (1.5 g vs 1.1 g).
Ingredients
Sucrine verte
Not available.
Sucrine
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sucrine verte or Sucrine?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sucrine has fewer calories: 14 kcal versus 20 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sucrine has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 2 g per 100 g.