Comparison
Sucrines bio vs Salade Sucrine
Overall, Salade Sucrine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sucrines bio | Salade Sucrine |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 16 kcal | 7 kcal |
| Fat | 0.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2 g | — |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 0.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Salade Sucrine has 57% fewer calories (7 kcal vs 16 kcal).
- Salade Sucrine has 64% less sugar (0.4 g vs 1.1 g).
Ingredients
Sucrines bio
Not available.
Salade Sucrine
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sucrines bio or Salade Sucrine?
Overall, Salade Sucrine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Salade Sucrine has fewer calories: 7 kcal versus 16 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Salade Sucrine has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.