Comparison

Sucralose sweetner tablets vs Sucralose

Overall, Sucralose has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Sucralose sweetner tablets	Sucralose
Nutri-Score	—	—
NOVA group	—	4
Calories	325 kcal	2 kcal
Fat	0.5 g	0 g
Saturated fat	0.1 g	0 g
Sugars	73 g	0.5 g
Salt	0.4 g	0 g
Fiber	—	0 g
Protein	3.6 g	0 g
Additives	0	2
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Sucralose has 99% fewer calories (2 kcal vs 325 kcal).
Sucralose has no fat, while Sucralose sweetner tablets has 0.5 g.
Sucralose has 99% less sugar (0.5 g vs 73 g).
Sucralose has 93% less salt (0 g vs 0.4 g).
Sucralose sweetner tablets has 100% more protein (3.6 g vs 0 g).

Ingredients

Sucralose sweetner tablets

Not available.

Sucralose

Eau, édulcorants (sucralose, fructose), correcteur d'acuité E330, conservateur E202.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sucralose sweetner tablets or Sucralose?

Overall, Sucralose has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sucralose has fewer calories: 2 kcal versus 325 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sucralose has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 73 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Edulcorel vs Sucralose Edulcorel vs Sucralose sweetner table... Sucralose Granulated Swe... vs Sucralose Sucralose Granulated Swe... vs Sucralose sweetner table... Harmony sucralose 0 calo... vs Sucralose Harmony sucralose 0 calo... vs Sucralose sweetner table... Sucralose vs Sucralosa líquida Sucralose sweetner table... vs Sucralosa líquida