Sucralose vs Pure via 65 morceaux
Overall, Pure via 65 morceaux has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sucralose | Pure via 65 morceaux |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 362 kcal | 398 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 90 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pure via 65 morceaux has no sugar, while Sucralose has 90 g.
Ingredients
Sucralose
Dextrose, édulcorant : sucralose (1,44%),
Pure via 65 morceaux
agent de charge : érythritol, édulcorant : glycosides de stéviol (extraits de plante de stevia), arômes naturels, Une consommation excessive peut avoir des effets laxatifs,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sucralose or Pure via 65 morceaux?
Overall, Pure via 65 morceaux has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sucralose has fewer calories: 362 kcal versus 398 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pure via 65 morceaux has less sugar: 0 g versus 90 g per 100 g.