Stracciatella Pasta filata Käse vs LOW-MOISTURE PART-SKIM MOZZARELLA cheese
Overall, Stracciatella Pasta filata Käse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Stracciatella Pasta filata Käse
LOW-MOISTURE PART-SKIM MOZZARELLA cheese
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Stracciatella Pasta filata K... | LOW-MOISTURE PART-SKIM MOZZA... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 247 kcal | 286 kcal |
| Fat | 22.5 g | 21.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 14.5 g | 10.7 g |
| Sugars | 1.5 g | 3.6 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 1.7 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 8.8 g | 25 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Stracciatella Pasta filata Käse has 14% fewer calories (247 kcal vs 286 kcal).
- LOW-MOISTURE PART-SKIM MOZZARELLA cheese has 26% less saturated fat (10.7 g vs 14.5 g).
- Stracciatella Pasta filata Käse has 58% less sugar (1.5 g vs 3.6 g).
- Stracciatella Pasta filata Käse has 60% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.7 g).
- LOW-MOISTURE PART-SKIM MOZZARELLA cheese has 65% more protein (25 g vs 8.8 g).
Ingredients
Stracciatella Pasta filata Käse
60% _Sahne_, pasteurisierte _Milch_, Speisesalz, mikrobielles Lab, Käsereikulturen, Säureregulator: Milchsäure.
LOW-MOISTURE PART-SKIM MOZZARELLA cheese
pasteurized part-skim milk, cheese culture, salt, microbial enzymes,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Stracciatella Pasta filata Käse or LOW-MOISTURE PART-SKIM MOZZARELLA cheese?
Overall, Stracciatella Pasta filata Käse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Stracciatella Pasta filata Käse has fewer calories: 247 kcal versus 286 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Stracciatella Pasta filata Käse has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.