Sticky Rice vs Riz gluant Sanpatong
Overall, Riz gluant Sanpatong has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sticky Rice | Riz gluant Sanpatong |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 177 kcal | 355 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | — |
| Protein | 3.2 g | 6.4 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sticky Rice has 50% fewer calories (177 kcal vs 355 kcal).
- Riz gluant Sanpatong has 50% less fat (1 g vs 2 g).
- Riz gluant Sanpatong has 50% more protein (6.4 g vs 3.2 g).
Ingredients
Sticky Rice
Natural Medium Grain Rice - Steamed (99%), Sunflower Oil, Acidity Regulator: Glucono-Delta-Lactone
Riz gluant Sanpatong
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sticky Rice or Riz gluant Sanpatong?
Overall, Riz gluant Sanpatong has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sticky Rice has fewer calories: 177 kcal versus 355 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Riz gluant Sanpatong has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.2 g per 100 g.