Comparison
Sticky Rice vs Riz gluant
Overall, Riz gluant has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sticky Rice | Riz gluant |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 177 kcal | 350 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 1.1 g |
| Protein | 3.2 g | 6 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sticky Rice has 50% fewer calories (177 kcal vs 350 kcal).
- Riz gluant has no fat, while Sticky Rice has 2 g.
- Riz gluant has 56% more fiber (1.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Riz gluant has 47% more protein (6 g vs 3.2 g).
- Riz gluant is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Sticky Rice
Natural Medium Grain Rice - Steamed (99%), Sunflower Oil, Acidity Regulator: Glucono-Delta-Lactone
Riz gluant
Riz gluant
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sticky Rice or Riz gluant?
Overall, Riz gluant has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sticky Rice has fewer calories: 177 kcal versus 350 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Riz gluant has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.2 g per 100 g.