Steaks Hachés 5% vs Steaks hachés charolais FB 5% MG x2
Overall, Steaks hachés charolais FB 5% MG x2 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Steaks Hachés 5%
Steaks hachés charolais FB 5% MG x2
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Steaks Hachés 5% | Steaks hachés charolais FB 5... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 125 kcal | 100 kcal |
| Fat | 2.5 g | 5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.2 g | 2.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Steaks hachés charolais FB 5% MG x2 has 20% fewer calories (100 kcal vs 125 kcal).
- Steaks Hachés 5% has 50% less fat (2.5 g vs 5 g).
- Steaks hachés charolais FB 5% MG x2 has no sugar, while Steaks Hachés 5% has 0.5 g.
Ingredients
Steaks Hachés 5%
100 % viande de bœuf.
Steaks hachés charolais FB 5% MG x2
100% viande bovine
FAQ
Which is healthier: Steaks Hachés 5% or Steaks hachés charolais FB 5% MG x2?
Overall, Steaks hachés charolais FB 5% MG x2 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Steaks hachés charolais FB 5% MG x2 has fewer calories: 100 kcal versus 125 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Steaks hachés charolais FB 5% MG x2 has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.