Solo vs Lay's Stax original
Overall, Solo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 10 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Solo | Lay's Stax original |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 382 kcal | 520 kcal |
| Fat | 2.7 g | 27 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 2.5 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 3.7 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 1.4 g |
| Fiber | 7 g | 3.9 g |
| Protein | 9.3 g | 4.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Solo has 27% fewer calories (382 kcal vs 520 kcal).
- Solo has 90% less fat (2.7 g vs 27 g).
- Solo has 84% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 2.5 g).
- Solo has 68% less sugar (1.2 g vs 3.7 g).
- Solo has 93% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.4 g).
- Solo has 44% more fiber (7 g vs 3.9 g).
- Solo has 54% more protein (9.3 g vs 4.3 g).
- Solo has the better Nutri-Score.
- Solo is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Lay's Stax original lists: Gluten, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Solo
Maiz* (89,9%) guisantes no pelados* (10%) y tiamina (vitamina B1). Sin gluten. Puede contener trazas de soja, leche y/o frutos de cáscara, "Ingredientes procedentes de agricultura ecológica.
Lay's Stax original
Pommes de terre deshydratées (49%),huile de tournesol,amidon (dont BLÉ),sirop de glucose,sel,émulsifiants (mono - et diglycérides d'acides gras),huile de colza
FAQ
Which is healthier: Solo or Lay's Stax original?
Overall, Solo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Solo has fewer calories: 382 kcal versus 520 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Solo has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 3.7 g per 100 g.