Tuiles Pringles Barbecue vs Lay's Stax original
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tuiles Pringles Barbecue | Lay's Stax original |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 516 kcal | 520 kcal |
| Fat | 29 g | 27 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.7 g | 2.5 g |
| Sugars | 3.9 g | 3.7 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 1.4 g |
| Fiber | 3.5 g | 3.9 g |
| Protein | 6 g | 4.3 g |
| Additives | 8 | 1 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lay's Stax original has 10% more fiber (3.9 g vs 3.5 g).
- Tuiles Pringles Barbecue has 28% more protein (6 g vs 4.3 g).
- Only Lay's Stax original lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Tuiles Pringles Barbecue
Pommes de terre déshydratées, huiles végétales (tournesol, maïs), farine de riz, amidon de BLÉ, farine de maïs, arôme barbecue (sucre, biscotte en poudre {BLÉ}, arômes, exhausteurs de goût {glutamate monosodique, guanylate disodique, inosinate disodique}, tomate en poudre, oignon en poudre, ail en poudre, colorant {extrait de paprika}, acidifiants {acide citrique, acide malique}, arômes de fumée, extrait de levure), émulsifiant (E471), maltodextrine, sel, colorant (rocou).
Lay's Stax original
Pommes de terre deshydratées (49%),huile de tournesol,amidon (dont BLÉ),sirop de glucose,sel,émulsifiants (mono - et diglycérides d'acides gras),huile de colza
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tuiles Pringles Barbecue or Lay's Stax original?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tuiles Pringles Barbecue has fewer calories: 516 kcal versus 520 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lay's Stax original has less sugar: 3.7 g versus 3.9 g per 100 g.