Comparison
Sok od breskve vs Zumo melocotón
Overall, Zumo melocotón has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sok od breskve | Zumo melocotón |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 47 kcal | 27 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | — |
| Sugars | 11 g | 4.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Zumo melocotón has 43% fewer calories (27 kcal vs 47 kcal).
- Zumo melocotón has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Zumo melocotón has 58% less sugar (4.6 g vs 11 g).
- Zumo melocotón has 100% more fiber (0.7 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Sok od breskve
Not available.
Zumo melocotón
ELOCOTÓN SIN AZÚCARES AÑADIDOS ON LOCOTON IN AZÚCARES AÑADIDOS HACENSAF HACENDADO
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sok od breskve or Zumo melocotón?
Overall, Zumo melocotón has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Zumo melocotón has fewer calories: 27 kcal versus 47 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Zumo melocotón has less sugar: 4.6 g versus 11 g per 100 g.