Comparison
Triangolini vs Zumo melocotón
Overall, Zumo melocotón has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Triangolini | Zumo melocotón |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 55 kcal | 27 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | — |
| Sugars | 12.6 g | 4.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Zumo melocotón has 51% fewer calories (27 kcal vs 55 kcal).
- Zumo melocotón has 63% less sugar (4.6 g vs 12.6 g).
Ingredients
Triangolini
Not available.
Zumo melocotón
ELOCOTÓN SIN AZÚCARES AÑADIDOS ON LOCOTON IN AZÚCARES AÑADIDOS HACENSAF HACENDADO
FAQ
Which is healthier: Triangolini or Zumo melocotón?
Overall, Zumo melocotón has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Zumo melocotón has fewer calories: 27 kcal versus 55 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Zumo melocotón has less sugar: 4.6 g versus 12.6 g per 100 g.