Comparison

Soda vs Japanese sparkling soda

Overall, Japanese sparkling soda has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientSodaJapanese sparkling soda
Nutri-Score b c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 46 kcal 0 kcal
Fat 0.8 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0.5 g 0 g
Sugars 0.3 g 0 g
Salt 0.2 g 0 g
Fiber 0.3 g —
Protein 9.2 g 0 g
Additives15
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Japanese sparkling soda has no calories, while Soda has 46 kcal.
  • Japanese sparkling soda has no fat, while Soda has 0.8 g.
  • Japanese sparkling soda has no saturated fat, while Soda has 0.5 g.
  • Japanese sparkling soda has no sugar, while Soda has 0.3 g.
  • Soda has 100% more protein (9.2 g vs 0 g).
  • Soda has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Soda

Carbonated Water, OLISMART (Cassava Root Fiber, Acacia Fiber, Guar Fiber, Nopal Cactus, Marshmallow Root, Calendula Flower, Kudzu Root), Strawberry Juice Concentrate, Cassava Root Syrup, Apple Juice Concentrate, Lemon Juice Concentrate, Stevia Leaf, Himalayan Pink Salt, Natural Flavors, Allulose Syrup, Concord Grape Juice Concentrate, Tartaric Acid, Quince Juice Concentrate, Lime Juice Concentrate.

Japanese sparkling soda

Eau pétillante, édulcorants : érythritol, acésulfame potassium, Sucralose, arôme de fruit de la passion, antioxydant : acide citrique, conservateur : sorbate de potassium

FAQ

Which is healthier: Soda or Japanese sparkling soda?

Overall, Japanese sparkling soda has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Japanese sparkling soda has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 46 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Japanese sparkling soda has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons