Soda vs Sparkling Pasjonsfrukt
Overall, Soda has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Soda | Sparkling Pasjonsfrukt |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 46 kcal | 31 kcal |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | — |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 7.8 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 9.2 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sparkling Pasjonsfrukt has 33% fewer calories (31 kcal vs 46 kcal).
- Sparkling Pasjonsfrukt has no fat, while Soda has 0.8 g.
- Soda has 96% less sugar (0.3 g vs 7.8 g).
- Soda has 100% more fiber (0.3 g vs 0 g).
- Soda has 100% more protein (9.2 g vs 0 g).
- Soda has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Soda
Carbonated Water, OLISMART (Cassava Root Fiber, Acacia Fiber, Guar Fiber, Nopal Cactus, Marshmallow Root, Calendula Flower, Kudzu Root), Strawberry Juice Concentrate, Cassava Root Syrup, Apple Juice Concentrate, Lemon Juice Concentrate, Stevia Leaf, Himalayan Pink Salt, Natural Flavors, Allulose Syrup, Concord Grape Juice Concentrate, Tartaric Acid, Quince Juice Concentrate, Lime Juice Concentrate.
Sparkling Pasjonsfrukt
Vann (87%), agavesirup* (10%), konsentrert pasjonsfruktjuice* (2%), konsentrert sitronjuice*, naturlig pasjonsfruktaroma, karbondioksid, stabilisator (E 410*). *Økologisk.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Soda or Sparkling Pasjonsfrukt?
Overall, Soda has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sparkling Pasjonsfrukt has fewer calories: 31 kcal versus 46 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Soda has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 7.8 g per 100 g.