Sparkling Pasjonsfrukt vs Japanese sparkling soda
Overall, Japanese sparkling soda has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Sparkling Pasjonsfrukt | Japanese sparkling soda |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 31 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0 g |
| Sugars | 7.8 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 2 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Japanese sparkling soda has no calories, while Sparkling Pasjonsfrukt has 31 kcal.
- Japanese sparkling soda has no sugar, while Sparkling Pasjonsfrukt has 7.8 g.
- Japanese sparkling soda has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Sparkling Pasjonsfrukt
Vann (87%), agavesirup* (10%), konsentrert pasjonsfruktjuice* (2%), konsentrert sitronjuice*, naturlig pasjonsfruktaroma, karbondioksid, stabilisator (E 410*). *Økologisk.
Japanese sparkling soda
Eau pétillante, édulcorants : érythritol, acésulfame potassium, Sucralose, arôme de fruit de la passion, antioxydant : acide citrique, conservateur : sorbate de potassium
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sparkling Pasjonsfrukt or Japanese sparkling soda?
Overall, Japanese sparkling soda has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Japanese sparkling soda has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 31 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Japanese sparkling soda has less sugar: 0 g versus 7.8 g per 100 g.