Comparison

So Lait d'Amande Citron de Sicile 4 x 100 g vs Beleaf LIME

Overall, So Lait d'Amande Citron de Sicile 4 x 100 g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSo Lait d'Amande Citron de S...Beleaf LIME
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 99 kcal 99 kcal
Fat 3.3 g 5.2 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 0.6 g
Sugars 10.8 g 7.3 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 1.3 g 0.9 g
Protein 1.5 g 1.9 g
Additives11
AllergensNutsNuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • So Lait d'Amande Citron de Sicile 4 x 100 g has 37% less fat (3.3 g vs 5.2 g).
  • So Lait d'Amande Citron de Sicile 4 x 100 g has 50% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Beleaf LIME has 32% less sugar (7.3 g vs 10.8 g).
  • So Lait d'Amande Citron de Sicile 4 x 100 g has 28% more fiber (1.3 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Beleaf LIME has 21% more protein (1.9 g vs 1.5 g).

Ingredients

So Lait d'Amande Citron de Sicile 4 x 100 g

Lait d'amande 76% (eau, purée d'amande 9,4%), sucre, citron de Sicile (9,2%), amidon modifié de maïs sans OGM, fibres d'agrumes, sel de calcium, arômes naturels, amidon, extrait d'algues (lithothamne), ferments. Traces éventuelles d'autres fruits à coque et de gluten.

Beleaf LIME

Eau, pâte aux amandes 9%, sucre, amidons, cellules de citrons, jus de limette 1 %, concentré de jus de citron, arôme, épaississant agar-agar.

FAQ

Which is healthier: So Lait d'Amande Citron de Sicile 4 x 100 g or Beleaf LIME?

Overall, So Lait d'Amande Citron de Sicile 4 x 100 g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

So Lait d'Amande Citron de Sicile 4 x 100 g has fewer calories: 99 kcal versus 99 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Beleaf LIME has less sugar: 7.3 g versus 10.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons