Slimfast Original Rich Chocolate Royale vs Reloat Vanille
Overall, Reloat Vanille has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Slimfast Original Rich Choco... | Reloat Vanille |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 423 kcal | 103 kcal |
| Fat | 15.4 g | 3.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.9 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 38.5 g | 7.4 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 15.4 g | 2.2 g |
| Protein | 7.7 g | 7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Reloat Vanille has 76% fewer calories (103 kcal vs 423 kcal).
- Reloat Vanille has 75% less fat (3.8 g vs 15.4 g).
- Reloat Vanille has 74% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1.9 g).
- Reloat Vanille has 81% less sugar (7.4 g vs 38.5 g).
- Reloat Vanille has 95% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.2 g).
- Slimfast Original Rich Chocolate Royale has 86% more fiber (15.4 g vs 2.2 g).
Ingredients
Slimfast Original Rich Chocolate Royale
Not available.
Reloat Vanille
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Slimfast Original Rich Chocolate Royale or Reloat Vanille?
Overall, Reloat Vanille has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Reloat Vanille has fewer calories: 103 kcal versus 423 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Reloat Vanille has less sugar: 7.4 g versus 38.5 g per 100 g.