Comparison
Sliced Swiss vs Emmentaler am Stück
Overall, Sliced Swiss has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sliced Swiss | Emmentaler am Stück |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 357 kcal | 394 kcal |
| Fat | 25 g | 30 g |
| Saturated fat | 17.9 g | 21 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 28.6 g | 31 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sliced Swiss has 17% less fat (25 g vs 30 g).
- Sliced Swiss has 15% less saturated fat (17.9 g vs 21 g).
- Only Sliced Swiss lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Sliced Swiss
PART SKIM MILK, CHEESE CULTURE, SALT, MICROBIAL RENNET.
Emmentaler am Stück
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sliced Swiss or Emmentaler am Stück?
Overall, Sliced Swiss has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sliced Swiss has fewer calories: 357 kcal versus 394 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sliced Swiss has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.