Sirop cerise vs Kers
Overall, Kers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sirop cerise | Kers |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 313 kcal | 11 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | — |
| Sugars | 73 g | 0.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 1 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kers has 96% fewer calories (11 kcal vs 313 kcal).
- Kers has 100% less sugar (0.3 g vs 73 g).
Ingredients
Sirop cerise
Sucre, sirop de glucose-fructose, jus de fruits à base de concentrés 26% (cerise 12%, citron, sureau), eau, arôme, acidifiant : acide citrique.
Kers
Water, kersensap uit Vruchtensapconcentraat 3,6%, voedingszuur (citroenzuur), natuurlijke aroma's, zwarte wortelconcentraat, appelextract, zoetstoffen (sucralose, steviolglycosiden uit stevia), conserveermiddelen (kaliumsorbaat, natriumbenzoaat), vitamine C.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sirop cerise or Kers?
Overall, Kers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kers has fewer calories: 11 kcal versus 313 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kers has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 73 g per 100 g.