Comparison
Senf vs Senf mittelscharf
Overall, Senf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Senf | Senf mittelscharf |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 111 kcal | 108 kcal |
| Fat | 7.4 g | 6.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 1.8 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 2.9 g | 2.3 g |
| Fiber | 5.5 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 6 g | 6.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Mustard | Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Senf has 44% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
- Senf mittelscharf has 21% less salt (2.3 g vs 2.9 g).
- Senf has 94% more fiber (5.5 g vs 0.3 g).
- Senf is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Senf
Wasser, Senfsaaten, Branntweinessig, Speisesalz, Zucker, Gewürze
Senf mittelscharf
Trinkwasser, Senfsaat, Branntweinessig, Salz, Zucker, Gewürze, natürliches Aroma.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Senf or Senf mittelscharf?
Overall, Senf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Senf mittelscharf has fewer calories: 108 kcal versus 111 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Senf has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 2 g per 100 g.