Mittelscharfer Senf vs Senf mittelscharf
Overall, Senf mittelscharf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mittelscharfer Senf | Senf mittelscharf |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 109 kcal | 108 kcal |
| Fat | 6.3 g | 6.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 3.4 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 3.9 g | 2.3 g |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 5.9 g | 6.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Mustard | Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Senf mittelscharf has 41% less sugar (2 g vs 3.4 g).
- Senf mittelscharf has 41% less salt (2.3 g vs 3.9 g).
- Senf mittelscharf has the better Nutri-Score.
- Mittelscharfer Senf is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Mittelscharfer Senf
Trinkwasser, Senfsaat, Branntweinessig, Speisesalz, Zucker, Gewürze, Karamellzuckersirup.
Senf mittelscharf
Trinkwasser, Senfsaat, Branntweinessig, Salz, Zucker, Gewürze, natürliches Aroma.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mittelscharfer Senf or Senf mittelscharf?
Overall, Senf mittelscharf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Senf mittelscharf has fewer calories: 108 kcal versus 109 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Senf mittelscharf has less sugar: 2 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.