Senf mittelscharf vs Senf mittelscharf
Overall, Senf mittelscharf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Senf mittelscharf | Senf mittelscharf |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 108 kcal | 111 kcal |
| Fat | 6.7 g | 7.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 1.8 g |
| Salt | 2.3 g | 2.9 g |
| Fiber | 0.3 g | 5.5 g |
| Protein | 6.1 g | 6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Mustard | Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Senf mittelscharf has 44% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
- Senf mittelscharf has 21% less salt (2.3 g vs 2.9 g).
- Senf mittelscharf has 94% more fiber (5.5 g vs 0.3 g).
- Senf mittelscharf is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Senf mittelscharf
Trinkwasser, Senfsaat, Branntweinessig, Salz, Zucker, Gewürze, natürliches Aroma.
Senf mittelscharf
Wasser, Senfsaaten, Branntweinessig, Speisesalz, Zucker, Gewürze
FAQ
Which is healthier: Senf mittelscharf or Senf mittelscharf?
Overall, Senf mittelscharf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Senf mittelscharf has fewer calories: 108 kcal versus 111 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Senf mittelscharf has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 2 g per 100 g.