Senf vs Mittelscharfer Senf
Overall, Senf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Senf | Mittelscharfer Senf |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 111 kcal | 109 kcal |
| Fat | 7.4 g | 6.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 1.8 g | 3.4 g |
| Salt | 2.9 g | 3.9 g |
| Fiber | 5.5 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 6 g | 5.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Mustard | Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mittelscharfer Senf has 15% less fat (6.3 g vs 7.4 g).
- Senf has 44% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
- Senf has 47% less sugar (1.8 g vs 3.4 g).
- Senf has 26% less salt (2.9 g vs 3.9 g).
- Senf has 95% more fiber (5.5 g vs 0.3 g).
- Senf has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Senf
Wasser, Senfsaaten, Branntweinessig, Speisesalz, Zucker, Gewürze
Mittelscharfer Senf
Trinkwasser, Senfsaat, Branntweinessig, Speisesalz, Zucker. Gewürze, Karamellzuckersirup.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Senf or Mittelscharfer Senf?
Overall, Senf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mittelscharfer Senf has fewer calories: 109 kcal versus 111 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Senf has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.