Comparison
Senf vs Senf
Overall, Senf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Senf | Senf |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 98 kcal | 111 kcal |
| Fat | 6.3 g | 7.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 1.5 g | 1.8 g |
| Salt | 2.6 g | 2.9 g |
| Fiber | — | 5.5 g |
| Protein | 5.6 g | 6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Mustard | Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Senf has 12% fewer calories (98 kcal vs 111 kcal).
- Senf has 15% less fat (6.3 g vs 7.4 g).
- Senf has 38% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
- Senf has 17% less sugar (1.5 g vs 1.8 g).
Ingredients
Senf
Wasser, Senfmehl, Branntweinessig, Speisesalz, Zucker, Gewürze.
Senf
Wasser, Senfsaaten, Branntweinessig, Speisesalz, Zucker, Gewürze
FAQ
Which is healthier: Senf or Senf?
Overall, Senf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Senf has fewer calories: 98 kcal versus 111 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Senf has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.