Comparison

Scotlands Munchy Mallow vs Topkuss Mini têtes Choco

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientScotlands Munchy MallowTopkuss Mini têtes Choco
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 445 kcal 418 kcal
Fat 19 g 15.3 g
Saturated fat 10 g 9 g
Sugars 41 g 51.6 g
Salt 0.4 g 0.2 g
Fiber 1.7 g 0.4 g
Protein 5.7 g 3.7 g
Additives100
AllergensEggs, Gelatin, Gluten, Milk, Nuts, SoybeansEggs

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Topkuss Mini têtes Choco has 19% less fat (15.3 g vs 19 g).
  • Topkuss Mini têtes Choco has 10% less saturated fat (9 g vs 10 g).
  • Scotlands Munchy Mallow has 21% less sugar (41 g vs 51.6 g).
  • Scotlands Munchy Mallow has 78% more fiber (1.7 g vs 0.4 g).
  • Scotlands Munchy Mallow has 35% more protein (5.7 g vs 3.7 g).
  • Topkuss Mini têtes Choco is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Scotlands Munchy Mallow lists: Gelatin, Gluten, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Scotlands Munchy Mallow

Milk chocolate 37 % (sugar, cocoa butter, whole milk powder, cocoa mass, emulsifier: soya lecithin and E476, natural vanilla flavouring) sugar, wheat flour, glucose syrup, vegetable fat (palm), humectant: sorbitol, gelatin, fat reduced cocoa powder, powdered egg-white, salt, raising agent (sodium-bicarbonate, ammonium-bicarbonate), preservative: potassium sorbate, flavour peanuts, hazelnut.

Topkuss Mini têtes Choco

oeuf, sucre, farine...

FAQ

Which is healthier: Scotlands Munchy Mallow or Topkuss Mini têtes Choco?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Topkuss Mini têtes Choco has fewer calories: 418 kcal versus 445 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Scotlands Munchy Mallow has less sugar: 41 g versus 51.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons