Schoko-Bons vs Lindor Lait
Overall, Schoko-Bons has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Schoko-Bons | Lindor Lait |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 576 kcal | 619 kcal |
| Fat | 36.6 g | 47 g |
| Saturated fat | 21.2 g | 35 g |
| Sugars | 52.2 g | 43 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 2.8 g | — |
| Protein | 8.3 g | 4.9 g |
| Additives | 3 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk, Nuts, Soybeans | Gluten, Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Schoko-Bons has 22% less fat (36.6 g vs 47 g).
- Schoko-Bons has 39% less saturated fat (21.2 g vs 35 g).
- Lindor Lait has 18% less sugar (43 g vs 52.2 g).
- Schoko-Bons has 41% more protein (8.3 g vs 4.9 g).
- Only Schoko-Bons lists: Nuts.
- Only Lindor Lait lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Schoko-Bons
Chocolat supérieur au LAIT 50% (sucre, LAIT en poudre, beurre de cacao, pâte de cacao, émulsifiants: lécithines [SOJA], vanilline), sucre, LAIT écrémé en poudre 12,5%, huile de palme, NOISETTES 5,8%, BEURRE concentré, chocolat noir (sucre, pâte de cacao, beurre de cacao, émulsifiants : lécithines [SOJA]; vanilline), agent d'enrobage: gomme arabique; sirop de glucose, émulsifiants: lecithines [SOJA]; vanilline.
Lindor Lait
sugar, vegetable fat (coprah, palmist), cocoa butter, cocoa paste, milk powder, skim milk powder, lactose, concentrated milk butter, emulsifier: soy lecithin, barley malt extract, flavours, vanilla pod,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Schoko-Bons or Lindor Lait?
Overall, Schoko-Bons has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Schoko-Bons has fewer calories: 576 kcal versus 619 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lindor Lait has less sugar: 43 g versus 52.2 g per 100 g.