Schnitzel vs AH Scharrel kipburger gepaneerd 2 stuks
Overall, Schnitzel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Schnitzel | AH Scharrel kipburger gepane... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 159 kcal | 240 kcal |
| Fat | 4.8 g | 13 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 3.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.4 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Tarwe |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Schnitzel has 34% fewer calories (159 kcal vs 240 kcal).
- Schnitzel has 63% less fat (4.8 g vs 13 g).
- Schnitzel has 38% less saturated fat (2 g vs 3.2 g).
- Schnitzel has 38% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
- Schnitzel has 25% more protein (16 g vs 12 g).
- Only AH Scharrel kipburger gepaneerd 2 stuks lists: Gluten, Tarwe.
Ingredients
Schnitzel
Not available.
AH Scharrel kipburger gepaneerd 2 stuks
58% kippenvlees, bloem (tarwe, rijst), 10% water, zonnebloemolie, zetmeel (aardappel, tarwe, tapioca, maïs), zout, specerijen (ui), gist, maltodextrine, natuurlijk aroma, voedingszuur (E330), kleurstof (E100), extract (specerijen, rozemarijn), poeder (pastinaak, peterseliewortel).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Schnitzel or AH Scharrel kipburger gepaneerd 2 stuks?
Overall, Schnitzel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Schnitzel has fewer calories: 159 kcal versus 240 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Schnitzel has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.