Comparison

Saucisse de Toulouse Traditionnelle et Truffade vs Truffade

Overall, Truffade has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSaucisse de Toulouse Traditi...Truffade
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 207 kcal 167 kcal
Fat 16 g 11.4 g
Saturated fat 8.4 g 7.2 g
Sugars 0.6 g 1.2 g
Salt 1.1 g 0.7 g
Fiber 1.7 g —
Protein 11 g 7.2 g
Additives30
AllergensMilk, TomeNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Truffade has 19% fewer calories (167 kcal vs 207 kcal).
  • Truffade has 29% less fat (11.4 g vs 16 g).
  • Truffade has 14% less saturated fat (7.2 g vs 8.4 g).
  • Saucisse de Toulouse Traditionnelle et Truffade has 50% less sugar (0.6 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Truffade has 39% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Saucisse de Toulouse Traditionnelle et Truffade has 35% more protein (11 g vs 7.2 g).
  • Only Saucisse de Toulouse Traditionnelle et Truffade lists: Milk, Tome.

Ingredients

Saucisse de Toulouse Traditionnelle et Truffade

Pomme de terre 58 %, saucisse de Toulouse traditionnelle 28,6 % (viande de porc origine France, eau, sel, dextrose, poivre noir, boyau naturel de porc), _tome_ fraîche 27 %, _lait_, _crème_ (stabilisant : carraghénane, émulsifiant : esters lactiques des mono - et diglycérides d'acides gras), sel, épices (antioxydant : acide citrique), huile de colza.

Truffade

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Saucisse de Toulouse Traditionnelle et Truffade or Truffade?

Overall, Truffade has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Truffade has fewer calories: 167 kcal versus 207 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Saucisse de Toulouse Traditionnelle et Truffade has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons