Saucisse a rotir de veau vs Saucisses de veau
Overall, Saucisses de veau has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Saucisse a rotir de veau | Saucisses de veau |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 249 kcal | 232 kcal |
| Fat | 22 g | 20 g |
| Saturated fat | 8 g | 7 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 1.7 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 3 | 4 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Saucisses de veau has 13% less saturated fat (7 g vs 8 g).
- Saucisses de veau has 50% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Saucisses de veau has 16% less salt (1.7 g vs 2 g).
- Saucisses de veau has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Saucisses de veau has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Saucisse a rotir de veau
viande de veau 37 % (Suisse), lait d'Appenzell 26 % (Suisse), lard (Suisse), viande de porc 11% (Suisse), sel de cuisine iodé, épices, stabilisants (E 262, E 450, E 452), poudre de jus de citron, sirop de glucose. Enveloppe: boyau de porc. Info allergies: contient du lait
Saucisses de veau
viande de veau (37 0%), eau, lard, viande de porc, sel de cuisine, proténs de LAIT, LACTOSE, maltodextrine dextrose condiment en poudre, extrait d'épices, antioxydant. acide ascorbique, stabilisants: É331 , E460, exhausteur de goût: glutamate monosodlque. Enveloppe: boyau de porc.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Saucisse a rotir de veau or Saucisses de veau?
Overall, Saucisses de veau has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Saucisses de veau has fewer calories: 232 kcal versus 249 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Saucisses de veau has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.