Comparison

Sauce Nantua aux écrévisses vs Sauce nantua

Overall, Sauce nantua has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSauce Nantua aux écrévissesSauce nantua
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 111 kcal 64 kcal
Fat 9.1 g 3.1 g
Saturated fat 5.5 g 1.9 g
Sugars 1.4 g 2.7 g
Salt 1.2 g 0.9 g
Protein 1.5 g 2.9 g
Additives20
AllergensCrustaceans, MilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sauce nantua has 42% fewer calories (64 kcal vs 111 kcal).
  • Sauce nantua has 66% less fat (3.1 g vs 9.1 g).
  • Sauce nantua has 65% less saturated fat (1.9 g vs 5.5 g).
  • Sauce Nantua aux écrévisses has 48% less sugar (1.4 g vs 2.7 g).
  • Sauce nantua has 28% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Sauce nantua has 48% more protein (2.9 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Sauce nantua has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Sauce Nantua aux écrévisses lists: Crustaceans, Milk.

Ingredients

Sauce Nantua aux écrévisses

Eau, CREME, coulis de tomate 5%, pulpe d'ECREVISSE 3%, arôme naturel (CRUSTACES), double concentré de tomate, amidon modifié de pomme de terre, vin blanc, ECREVISSES 1%, contient huile de tournesol et/ou huile de colza, cognac, sel, épaississant : gomme xanthane, poivre.

Sauce nantua

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sauce Nantua aux écrévisses or Sauce nantua?

Overall, Sauce nantua has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sauce nantua has fewer calories: 64 kcal versus 111 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sauce Nantua aux écrévisses has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 2.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons