Comparison

Sauce Nantua aux écrévisses vs Sauce Nantua

Overall, Sauce Nantua aux écrévisses has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSauce Nantua aux écrévissesSauce Nantua
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 111 kcal 166 kcal
Fat 9.1 g 14.4 g
Saturated fat 5.5 g 8.8 g
Sugars 1.4 g 3.2 g
Salt 1.2 g 0.8 g
Protein 1.5 g 4.2 g
Additives20
AllergensCrustaceans, MilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sauce Nantua aux écrévisses has 33% fewer calories (111 kcal vs 166 kcal).
  • Sauce Nantua aux écrévisses has 37% less fat (9.1 g vs 14.4 g).
  • Sauce Nantua aux écrévisses has 38% less saturated fat (5.5 g vs 8.8 g).
  • Sauce Nantua aux écrévisses has 56% less sugar (1.4 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Sauce Nantua has 33% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Sauce Nantua has 64% more protein (4.2 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Only Sauce Nantua aux écrévisses lists: Crustaceans, Milk.

Ingredients

Sauce Nantua aux écrévisses

Eau, CREME, coulis de tomate 5%, pulpe d'ECREVISSE 3%, arôme naturel (CRUSTACES), double concentré de tomate, amidon modifié de pomme de terre, vin blanc, ECREVISSES 1%, contient huile de tournesol et/ou huile de colza, cognac, sel, épaississant : gomme xanthane, poivre.

Sauce Nantua

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sauce Nantua aux écrévisses or Sauce Nantua?

Overall, Sauce Nantua aux écrévisses has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sauce Nantua aux écrévisses has fewer calories: 111 kcal versus 166 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sauce Nantua aux écrévisses has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 3.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons