Comparison

Sås Senap & Dill - Sauce à la moutarde et à l'aneth vs Moutarde forte

Overall, Moutarde forte has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSås Senap & Dill - Sauce à l...Moutarde forte
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 450 kcal 158 kcal
Fat 38 g 12 g
Saturated fat 2.5 g 0.7 g
Sugars 22 g 2.1 g
Salt 0.6 g 4.7 g
Fiber 0 g 3.4 g
Protein 2.1 g 7.7 g
Additives10
AllergensMustardMustard

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Moutarde forte has 65% fewer calories (158 kcal vs 450 kcal).
  • Moutarde forte has 68% less fat (12 g vs 38 g).
  • Moutarde forte has 72% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Moutarde forte has 90% less sugar (2.1 g vs 22 g).
  • Sås Senap & Dill - Sauce à la moutarde et à l'aneth has 87% less salt (0.6 g vs 4.7 g).
  • Moutarde forte has 100% more fiber (3.4 g vs 0 g).
  • Moutarde forte has 73% more protein (7.7 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Sås Senap & Dill - Sauce à la moutarde et à l'aneth has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Moutarde forte is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Sås Senap & Dill - Sauce à la moutarde et à l'aneth

Huile de colza, moutarde (35%) (eau, sucre, graines de moutarde, vinaigre d'alcool, sel, épices), sucre, eau, aneth (4%), vinaigre de vin rouge, curcuma, colorant (E160a).

Moutarde forte

Eau, graines de moutarde* 33% (France), vinaigre de cidre* 27% (France), sel marin

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sås Senap & Dill - Sauce à la moutarde et à l'aneth or Moutarde forte?

Overall, Moutarde forte has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Moutarde forte has fewer calories: 158 kcal versus 450 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Moutarde forte has less sugar: 2.1 g versus 22 g per 100 g.

More comparisons