Comparison

Sanglier et champignon lait vs Wildfleisch Leberwurst

Overall, Wildfleisch Leberwurst has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSanglier et champignon laitWildfleisch Leberwurst
Nutri-Score d —
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 684 kcal 387 kcal
Fat 64.6 g 36.9 g
Saturated fat 31.7 g —
Sugars 15.1 g 1 g
Salt 0.2 g 2 g
Fiber 1.9 g —
Protein 9.2 g 11.9 g
Additives20
AllergensMilk, Nuts, Sesame seeds, SoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Wildfleisch Leberwurst has 43% fewer calories (387 kcal vs 684 kcal).
  • Wildfleisch Leberwurst has 43% less fat (36.9 g vs 64.6 g).
  • Wildfleisch Leberwurst has 93% less sugar (1 g vs 15.1 g).
  • Sanglier et champignon lait has 92% less salt (0.2 g vs 2 g).
  • Wildfleisch Leberwurst has 23% more protein (11.9 g vs 9.2 g).
  • Wildfleisch Leberwurst is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Sanglier et champignon lait lists: Milk, Nuts, Sesame seeds, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Sanglier et champignon lait

Pâte de cacao 34 %, poudre de _lait_, beurre de cacao, lécithine de _soja_, _amandes_, sucre, _noisettes_, vanille, _sésame_.

Wildfleisch Leberwurst

56% Wildschweinfleisch, 18% Schweineleber, Schweinespeck, Zwiebeln, 5% Schweinefleisch, jodiertes Kochsalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumjodat), Wacholderbeeröl, Gewürze.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sanglier et champignon lait or Wildfleisch Leberwurst?

Overall, Wildfleisch Leberwurst has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Wildfleisch Leberwurst has fewer calories: 387 kcal versus 684 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Wildfleisch Leberwurst has less sugar: 1 g versus 15.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons